So there are still crazy sci-fi elements, but I think it makes more sense in context on Wii than it did on DS. But, I think the new sixth chapter is a lot more grounded in reality / interesting than liberating the boat was in the original game. Tomm: Since the overall plot deals with the same things, yes you'll still be dealing with GUILT, the super-virus. IGN Wii: The sci-fi elements from the DS build are back? The new doctor adds a new dimension to the plot, and I think the new sixth chapter is far more interesting than that of the original game. As for the returning chapters, I went over all that text and tightened it up, as well as tied it into the new stuff so everything felt cohesive and natural. Tomm: As I said above, the sixth chapter is entirely new, and there are a number of missions before that point which are also unique to the Wii version. IGN Wii: So the storyline is more or less the same? It features new operations with a new playable character, an entirely new 6th chapter that replaces the previous game's chapter six, and some new tools. Remakes would be Final Fantasy III DS, Lunar: SSSC, or Mega Man Powered Up.
#Trauma center second opinion injection code
In a remake, the engine is entirely new code, not just modified code from another version of the game. A remake is like MGS: Twin Snakes, where an existing game is entirely rebuilt - the story is the same, but voices are re-recorded, graphics are recreated, music is redone, etc. Ports would be like Mortal Kombat back in the day, RE4 for PS2, or GTA: Liberty City Stories for PS2. Some new content might be added, but the two games are virtually identical (barring hardware differences). Tomm: This seems to be causing a lot of confusion because I don't think people really all have the same definition of "port." A port is like, say, MGS2: Subsistence for Xbox, where an existing game is reprogrammed to work on a different platform than it originally appeared on. You've referred to the game as a "Wii-make." Would you consider it a port? It immediately implies certain features, like the second playable doctor, a second look at the storyline, etc. In the end, "Second Opinion" was just the best choice. I was struggling to come up with anything when my wife said "How about Second Opinion?" Well, that seemed like the only logical choice, so everyone at Atlus debated with other names like "Trauma Center: Relapse" and such being suggested. This made naming the sequel a bit of a challenge, since we wanted something just as "clever" as Under the Knife, which also communicated that this was the second game in the series.
#Trauma center second opinion injection series
Tomm Hulett: Well, the Japanese name for the series is "Caduceus," so clearly we came up with our own title for the original game, Trauma Center: Under the Knife. IGN Wii: What's behind the name Trauma Center: Second Opinion?
0 kommentar(er)
